Child Pornography and
the Internet: The Trials and Tribulations of Policing
A Research Proposal
Megan Osorio
English 202
Dr. Sherwood
Fall 2009
Abstract
With the
popularity of the internet and file sharing, more acts are becoming criminal,
in the efforts to keep up with the digital age. Social networking sites have
made it a lot easier for people to share information, and images - but sometimes;
these advancements are not innocently used. The debate as to whether or not
certain crimes occur via the internet is a too broad of a topic to touch base
on. The crime intended to be the focal point of this research is child
pornography. Do child pornography laws violate the first amendment rights? Does
the internet hinder or enable policing of child pornography laws? This paper
will begin with a description and history of child pornography before it gained
speed with the internet; then evolve into the issues that law enforcement is
facing when trying to police the internet and child pornography. We will
realize at the end of this research that policing child pornography has run
into some obstacles, a Supreme Court ruling stating the laws on child
pornography does not violate first amendment rights; but also look at the
advancements of law to protect us from the digital world.
Introduction
From the research that has been conducted,
this paper will reflect on the cheers and jeers of enforcing and applying child
pornography laws when dealing with internet offenders. As much as child
pornography is not a widely debated topic, there are numerous studies looking
at offenders, why they offend, and whether or not the internet has enabled
these pedophiles to hide from law enforcement.
In the most
recent years, a real crackdown on internet child pornography has increased and
heightened one's knowledge, and made aware of how many child predators are out
there in every kind of employment. The realization of the offenders being
everyday people, and not someone who looks like a Jeffrey Dahmer, has warranted
many people to be quick to judge a person a predator when some images may be
innocent. Such a case has happened recently with a couple who took pictures of
their two toddlers during bath time, went to get the film developed at a
Wal-mart but was turned in to police because of the images. From this
situation, could this happen with images on the internet?
By the
conclusion of this research, hopefully recommendations can be made, whether it
is to continue to progress with practices that have been effective, or to make
additional laws and/or methods of enforcement.
Fieldwork Statement
Child
pornography is not a widely spoken about, nor is it an issue in which a person
is willing to confess to, because of this, I would find it very hard to find an
offender who would be agree to an interview to help further my research.
Right now, I
am hoping to find a Criminology professor in my department who has done work
and research in the field of child pornography, knowledge of cybercrimes, and a
deep understanding of the laws applied. Just like the non-academic world, it
will be interesting to find a professor who has an extensive knowledge of
internet child pornography laws. It has been my experience from the many years
and many classes taken here at this university, this topic has never come up
for discussion.
Sample
questions for the interview will include: 1) Do you believe the internet has
created more criminals, 2) Do you believe internet child pornography is harder
to prosecute, 3) Are law enforcement agencies computer literate enough to be
able to catch these offenders, 4) Should there be more laws against internet
child pornography, 5) Would you have any recommendations to improve chances of
enforcing and prosecuting these laws, 6) What has law enforcement agencies
gotten right?
Source Review
For the
history section of my paper, I have one article that focuses on this topic alone.
A few of the other articles briefly touch base on the history of child
pornography in which I will incorporate into my research. With the overview of
child pornography's history, we will be able to see how the conversion into the
internet and digital age had occurred. There is a briefing as to how many
websites exist, how much of a following, and a write up of whom is typically a
victim.
The three
articles involved in the law section give two different perspectives. The first
article by Esposito, gives us a view of the current laws in placed for internet
child pornography, what is needed to improve the laws, how to keep up with the
ever evolving technology age, and the downfalls of policing. The second
article, by Nunziato, looks at the current child pornography laws and their
impact on decreasing the crimes. The third article by Wells, discusses the
trials and tribulations of policing internet child pornography, what has to
transpire in order to constitute it to be a crime.
Howitt and
Sheldon touch on as to who typically is the offender in child pornography
crimes. These offenders are broken down into internet and contact offenders. Though
it seems as if they are only talking about pedophilia, child pornography is
considered a form of pedophilia. With this article, and hopefully with more
articles for the final paper, I will be able to debate as to whether or not
child pornography voyeurism is a form of pedophilia.
The academic
portions of this research presently take a look at two articles, with hopes to
expand further. The first article by Middleton and others takes a look at a specific
model of research to see why an offender commits a crime, but what trait in
this person's life was the causation to do such crimes. The research done in
this article takes a look at the Ward and Siegert Pathways Model of sexual
offending, but applied it to internet offenders. The second academic article by
Quayle and Taylor is a case study of multiple men who were convicted of
downloading child pornography. Within this research, the authors looked at the
transcripts of their interviews to determine the psychological affect these
offenders have when they view such photographs. This article will help aid as
determining what actions or at what point a crime is committed.
Working Bibliography
History:
Casanova, Manuel F., et al. "The History of Child
Pornography on the Internet." Journal of Sex Education & Therapy
25.4 (2000): 245-251. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 1 Nov. 2009.
Law:
Esposito, Lesli C. "Regulating the Internet: The new
battle against child pornography." Case Western Reserve Journal of
International Law 30.2/3 (1998): 541. International Security & Counter
Terrorism Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 1 Nov. 2009.
Nunziato, Dawn C. "Technology and Pornography." Brigham
Young University Law Review 2007.6 (2007): 1535-1584. International
Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 6 Nov. 2009.
Wells, Melissa, et al. "Defining Child Pornography: Law
Enforcement Dilemmas in Investigations of Internet Child Pornography
Possession." Police Practice & Research 8.3 (2007): 269-282. International
Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 8 Nov. 2009.
Who Offends:
Howitt, Dennis, and Kerry Sheldon "The role of cognitive
distortions in paedophilic offending: Internet and contact offenders
compared." Psychology, Crime & Law 13.5 (2007): 469-486. International
Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center. EBSCO. Web. 4 Nov. 2009.
Academic:
Middleton, David, et al. "An investigation into the
applicability of the Ward and Siegert Pathways Model of child sexual abuse with
Internet offenders." Psychology, Crime & Law 12.6 (2006):
589-603. International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center.
EBSCO. Web. 3 Nov. 2009.
Quayle, Ethel, and Max Taylor "Child Pornography and the
Internet: Perpetuating a Cycle of Abuse." Deviant Behavior 23.4
(2002): 331-361. International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference
Center. EBSCO. Web. 8 Nov. 2009.

Leave a comment