After reading through Kerouac poems in "Book of Blues," I can't really imagine anyone with an imparticularly different or soothing voice reading them in my head. I suppose it would be more like a cool, every day, "living on the streets" voice. The way the that there are rarely to no puncuation markings makes me think that it isn't a very proper poem, like Emily Dickinson. Because of this, maybe it could be considered a "jazz poem." But originally reading through the poem, though, it doesn't lead me to think it is one. It may be possible to call it a "jazz poem" because the stanzas are labeled as choruses and the margin of the poems are wavy and staggered, not all in a line. This can let the reader be more free with the poem, possibly improvise like jazz musicians.
The recording of Kerouac and Zoot Simms really puts the whole "jazz poem" into perspective. The way that Kerouac reads the poem is obviously the way it is supposed to be read, which makes sense with the way it is written. Kerouac takes his time is some places and speeds up in others when there is not puncuation to do so. This is like he is improvising. He even edits parts of the poem as he is going along. The saxophone makes it even more like a "jazz poem." Although, at times, the saxophone can seem like too much to listen to when the poem is being read and too busy, I think it adds the feel of the smooth, cool jazz to the poem and the city setting that Kerouac is trying to portray in the poem. There are even times when the saxophone trys to mimic what the poem is representing, which really gives a cool mood to the poem. The poem with the jazz saxophone in the background definately makes a boring poem into a "jazz poem."

Recent Comments